Facultative vs. Treaty Reinsurance
- 01:47
An analysis of the difference between facultative and treaty reinsurance agreements
Downloads
No associated resources to download.
Glossary
Transcript
Let's have a look at the different types of reinsurance products that exist in the reinsurance market.
At a high level, there are two main categorizations of reinsurance policies, facultative and treaty facultative.
Reinsurance covers single risks or defined packages of risks.
These contracts are negotiated individually for each single or package of risks that they cover With facultative reinsurance, the reinsurer retains the right to accept or reject each risk performing its own internal underwriting process.
This type of reinsurance is typically used for high value or hazardous risks, such as reinsuring rare artwork.
It offers flexibility since each contract is individually negotiated, but it requires more transactional effort for each contract to be completed.
On the other hand, we have treaty reinsurance.
This involves a seeding of a primary insurer's entire book of business within a defined class.
For example, this might relate to all homeowner policies without the reinsurer reviewing the individual risk profile of every policy within the class Treaty reinsurance agreements are long-term pre-negotiated agreements.
They're generally more cost effective for the primary insurer and require less administrative work.
Treaty reinsurance policies don't deal with the risk of an individual bespoke insurance policy.
Instead focusing on stability and broader risk coverage for the primary insurer.
Ultimately, the choice between facultative and treaty reinsurance depends on the primary insurer's needs with faculty offering flexibility for specific risks and treaty providing efficiency for broader portfolios.