The Issuer's Perspective - Private vs. Public Equity Part 1
- 03:03
Understand the key advantages and considerations of private versus public equity from an issuer's perspective.
Downloads
No associated resources to download.
Glossary
liquidity Private Equity Public EquityTranscript
Let's now take a look at private and public equity from the issuer's perspective. Because when a company is looking to raise capital, both forms of equity come with their own set of advantages and disadvantages. Let's start with private equity. Private equity represents a unique avenue for companies seeking capital. It's akin to an exclusive network where investment is not just about capital, but also about the value add from the investors' expertise and industry connections. Investors in the private equity sphere often bring more than just money to the table. They bring a depth of management expertise and a breadth of industry contacts that can be pivotal for a company's trajectory. This partnership can steer a company through growth and development with a seasoned hand. Negotiating the terms of private equity investments offers flexibility that is absent in public markets. Each agreement can be sculpted to fit the precise needs and goals of both the issuer and the investor, ensuring a bespoke fit for financial strategies. Also, consider the long-term orientation of private equity investments. Here investors are not merely spectators. They're patient cultivators, allowing the company the time and space to mature according to long-term strategic plans.
And from a regulatory standpoint, private equity is less demanding. The process forgoes the extensive disclosure requirements typical of public offerings, presenting a streamlined cost effective approach to raising capital. However, these advantages are counterbalanced by considerations that demand attention. When private equity investors come on board, they often seek a firm grasp of the reigns influencing company decisions. This can lead to significant dilution of control for the original owners and a significant shift in governance dynamics. These investors also anticipate robust growth and returns. The bar is set high and the company must rise to meet these expectations, which can introduce a demanding performance climate. Furthermore, the universe of private equity is more contained, offering a smaller pool of potential investors. This limitation can impact the scale of capital that can be raised, which is a critical factor for issuers to consider. So to conclude, for issuers, private equity can be a powerful mechanism for funding, offering a combination of capital and strategic partnership. However, it is imperative to balance the tangible benefits with the strategic considerations Just mentioned.